The politics of perception is a funny thing. Pass a $780 billion economic bill and a migratory flock of pundits proclaim the failure of bipartisanship. But the New Yorker’s Hedrick Hertzberg sees a metagame silver-lining (well, that, and passing the damn bill):
Fifty years ago, the civil-rights movement understood that nonviolence can be an effective weapon even if—or especially if—the other side refuses to follow suit. Obama has a similarly tough-minded understanding of the political uses of bipartisanship, which, even if it fails as a tactic for compromise, can succeed as a tonal strategy: once the other side makes itself appear intransigently, destructively partisan, the game is half won. Obama is learning to throw the ball harder. But it’s not Rovian hardball he’s playing. More like Gandhian hardball.
Gandhi, of course, played only hardball, and played only to win. He understood better than anyone that the battle of perception had to be waged at the nexus of the enemy’s hypocrisy and conscience. Finding that nexus is the tricky part.
